Family Research Council

  • March 21, 2012

    by Jeremy Leaming

    Some snarky pundits, typically those on the Right, might give short-shrift to the ‘war against women,’ but for those grappling with reality, it’s not a mere talking point.

    Beyond the Right’s obsession with micromanaging women’s health care concerns, there is the disconcerting attempt, as this blog has already noted, to scuttle or seriously slow the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act. The Senate Judiciary Committee approved the reauthorization legislation in February, but some Senate Republicans, such as Iowa Sen. Charles Grassley have groused that the reauthorization is troubling because it seeks to provide help to even more women, the LGBT community and immigrants. The New York Times editorial board blasted Republican opposition to the measure as “driven largely by an antigay, anti-immigrant, agenda.”

    Tony Perkins, head of the shrill, frequently over-the-top Religious Right outfit the Family Research Council, has blasted discussion of the reauthorization of the VAWA as “cheap” political maneuvering. Instead the reauthorization measure is seriously flawed, and “does real violence to the budget and individual freedom.” He then cites veteran right-winger Phyllis Schafly who says the VAWA is really like a “slush fund for the feminist lobby.”

    Despite the measure’s unfortunate opposition, by fringe characters like Perkins, and sadly even the likes of Grassley, Sen. Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy (pictured) announced recently that the reauthorization measure now has 60 sponsors – Sen. Dean Heller, a Nevada Republican.

    “I am grateful that Senator Heller has joined as a cosponsor of this important bill,” Leahy said in a press statement. “Every victim of violence deserves to access the resources available through the VAWA. Congress should act, without delay, to approve this commonsense legislation.”

  • November 10, 2011

    by Jeremy Leaming

    While it is unlikely to be replicated in the Republican-controlled House of Representatives, lawmakers on the Senate side took a step toward repealing the so-called Defense of Marriage Act or DOMA, the federal law that discriminates against lesbians and gay men.

    The Senate Judiciary Committee votied in support of the Respect for Marriage Act, which would repeal DOMA. Before today’s vote, Democrats rallied around marriage equality, while several Republicans decried the Committee's action as political posturing, and all voted against the repeal bill.

    Sen. Dianne Feinstein, who introduced the measure earlier this year, knocked DOMA, calling it “wrong when it passed in 1996 and it is wrong now. There are 131,000 legally married couples in this country who are denied more than 1,100 federal rights and protections because of this discriminatory law. I don’t know long the battle for full equality will take, but we are on the cusp of change, and today’s historic vote in the committee is an important step forward.”

    Committee Chairman Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) blasted DOMA for denying equal treatment to gay couples. “The Federal Government should not deny recognition and protection to the thousands of Americans who are lawfully married under their state law. We must repeal DOMA to ensure the freedom and equality of all our citizens.”

    Sens. Charles Schumer, Richard Durbin, Al Franken, Christopher Coons and Blumenthal, also weighed in on the side of marriage equality. See some of their comments here.

    Republican Sen. John Cornyn, chided the Committee for moving the bill to the Senate floor where it would not be voted on “this year or next,” as The Huffington Post reports. According to Cornyn, today’s action was all about political maneuvering for next year’s general election.

  • October 27, 2010
    Education Policy
    The head of one of the country's largest conservative lobbying groups, the Family Research Council, says gay youth are prone to depression and suicide because they are "abnormal," not because they are victims of harassment or bullying. The Huffington Post notes Tony Perkins's comments to NPR about "how religious movements fit into the anti-gay bullying equation."

    Perkins maintained, "There's no correlation between inacceptance of homosexuality and depression and suicide. These young people who identify as gay or lesbian, we know from the social science that they have a higher propensity to depression or suicide because of that internal conflict."

    This week the U.S. Department of Education sent a letter to public school districts and universities nationwide providing guidance on complying with federal laws intended to prevent harassment of students. In a press statement about the letter, the Department of Education states that federal education anti-discrimination laws provide protection against harassment of gay and lesbian students. The letter states that its guidance "explains educators' legal obligations to protect students from student-on-student racial and national origin harassment, sexual and gender-based harassment, and disability harassment."

    Russlynn H. Ali, assistant secretary for civil rights, told The New York Times, "Folks need to wake up. We have a crisis in our schools in which bullying and harassment seems to be a rite of passage, and it doesn't need to be that way."

    In its coverage of the 10-page letter, The Times wrote that Education Department officials said that distribution of the letter "took on new urgency in recent weeks because of a string of high-profile cases in which students have committed suicide after enduring bullying by classmates," and citied an incident at Rutgers University involving the harassment of a male student following his "intimate encounter with another man." The Rutgers student committed suicide last month.

    The Education Department includes a link to the administration's "Stop Bullying Now Campaign," which includes research on the matter. A 2010 study states that gay, lesbian and bisexual youth "are more likely to report being bullied than are heterosexual youth."

  • October 8, 2009

    The Conference Report for the Defense Department Appropriations Reauthorization was released yesterday including the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act, which would classify violent crimes against LGBT victims as hate crimes. The Conference Report is the result of negotiations between the House of Representatives and Senate to reconcile legislation passed by each chamber. The reconciled bill must still garner majority support from each chamber before being sent to the president.

    Law Dork's Chris Geidner has the details on the Act:

    On page 1483 [of the pdf] (1361 of the bill), the penalties lay out a maximum of life imprisonment for the most severe types of hate-motivated crimes. They are when:
  • * death results from the offense.
  • * the offense includes kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill.
  • The bill provides for no greater penalties.

    In an apparent effort to obstruct passage of the Hate Crimes Act earlier this year, Sen. Jeff Sessions amended the bill to allow capital punishment for hate crimes. Many backers of the Hate Crimes Act objected to the amendment, issuing statements like that from the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, which criticized capital punishment in light of "significant doubts about its deterrent effect and clear evidence of disproportionate application against poor people. Moreover, there are serious, well-documented concerns about unequal and racially biased application of the death penalty."