State of the Union

  • January 25, 2012

    by Jeremy Leaming

    In a State of the Union address that was largely focused on promoting policies intended to tackle the nation’s festering economic inequalities, President Obama found a moment to urge an end to destructive delays of his selections to federal offices, including his nominations to the federal bench.

    “Some of what’s broken has to do with the way Congress does its business these days,” Obama said toward the latter end of his lengthy address. “A simple majority is no longer enough to get anything – even routine business – passed through the Senate. Neither party has been blameless in these tactics. Now both parties should put an end to it. For starters, I ask the Senate to pass a rule that all judicial and public service nominations receive a simple up or down vote within 90 days.”

    According to JudicialNominations.org, there are 84 vacancies on the federal bench, 32 of which are considered judicial emergencies by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts. A recent study by the Brookings Institution’s Russell Wheeler shows that vacancies on the federal bench have jumped during the president’s tenure, in part due to the mounting delays in the Senate of consideration of judicial nominations.

    In an ACS Issue Brief, UNC School of Law Professor Michael Gerhardt and University of Minnesota Law School Professor Richard Painter, citing the rising rancor over judicial nominations, called on lawmakers to renew efforts to end the obstruction. The authors decried the use of “judicial filibusters, among other means of obstruction within the Senate,” saying they are creating a federal judiciary that is not “operating at full strength.”

    The bulk of the president’s address, however, centered on the nation’s growing wealth gap, which the Occupy Wall Street protests have helped propel to the forefront of the nation’s attention.

  • January 29, 2010
    President Obama has stirred some loud complaints for critiquing the Supreme Court's controversial opinion in Citizens United v. FEC during his State of the Union address. Justice Samuel Alito, who joined the majority in Citizens United, expressed frustration during the president's criticism, reportedly mouthing the words "not true."

    But Scott Lemieux at Lawyers, Guns and Money notes a couple of examples of politicians, including a president, taking quick and sharp shots at Supreme Court decisions. Lemieux cites:

    • "The 10th anniversary of the Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade is a good time for us to pause and reflect. Our nationwide policy of abortion-on-demand through all nine months of pregnancy [sic] was neither voted for by our people nor enacted by our legislators - not a single state had such unrestricted abortion [sic] before the Supreme Court decreed it to be national policy in 1973. But the consequences of this judicial decision are now obvious: since 1973, more than 15 million unborn children have had their lives snuffed out by legalized abortions. That is over ten times the number of Americans lost in all our nation's wars...Make no mistake, abortion-on-demand is not a right granted by the Constitution." --Saint Ronald Reagan, 1983
    • "After a day of consideration, the McCain Campaign has decided to come out hard against yesterday's 5 to 4 decision to grant more rights to court review for enemy combatants held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. "The United States Supreme Court yesterday rendered a decision which I think is one of the worst decisions in the history of this country," McCain said. He went on to quote from Justice Roberts dissent in the case, rail against "unaccountable judges," and say that the courts are about to be clogged with cases from detainees."

    [image via goldenstate.files